Shell is preparing a Shell offshore wind sale that could raise more than $1bn, according to Bloomberg, which cited people familiar with the matter. The oil and gas major has hired advisers from Rothschild & Co. and PJT Partners Inc. to lead the process, which could launch as soon as the end of this year, with a transaction likely to take place in 2027.
The planned divestment would dispose of Shell’s remaining offshore wind interests in one move. Put alongside a string of earlier exits, it amounts to a near-total withdrawal from a sector the company once positioned as central to its low-carbon future.
The divestment follows a pattern of quiet, piecemeal exits that has gathered pace over the past two years. In March 2024, Shell sold its 50% stake in SouthCoast Wind Energy off the Massachusetts coast, according to Electrek. Then, in November 2025, the company exited the MunmuBaram floating wind project in South Korea. That same month it pulled back from the CampionWind and MarramWind projects off Scotland.
The report also notes that Shell has separately ditched plans for ScotWind offshore wind sites. Taken together, these moves leave the company’s remaining offshore wind portfolio as the asset now being formally marketed. The $1bn-plus price tag, if achieved, is the headline number, but the more material story is what it signals about how Shell now values wind energy as a business line.
Chief executive officer Wael Sawan has sought to cut costs and offload low-returning assets since taking over more than three years ago. Bloomberg frames the offshore wind sale as a further move away from Shell’s earlier strategy to diversify into green electricity, with a strong emphasis on wind.
That earlier strategy was not cheap to unwind. Shell bought Indian renewable power company Sprng Energy in 2022 for $1.55bn. Its divestment of Sprng, alongside the ongoing disposal of Shell’s European onshore renewables arm, suggests the retreat spans the full renewables portfolio, not just offshore wind.
The SouthCoast Wind exit in March 2024 is worth dwelling on. That project sat in a US offshore wind market that was already suffering from inflation, supply-chain delays and contract cancellations. Exiting there may have looked prudent at the time. The MunmuBaram departure in South Korea and the twin Scottish withdrawals in November 2025 are harder to explain away on project-specific grounds alone: they point to a strategic call, not a series of one-off commercial disappointments.
For Scope 1 and Scope 2 reporting purposes, divesting wind assets does not improve Shell’s own emissions profile, those assets produce no Scope 1 emissions. What it does affect is the company’s ability to credibly claim progress on Scope 3, where purchased and sold energy flows matter. Selling off the renewables business does not make the barrels of oil and gas cleaner; it simply removes the green electricity from the ledger.
Shell’s original renewables push was never convincingly integrated into its core capital allocation framework. The company repeatedly framed wind and solar as growth businesses without setting out the internal rate of return hurdles those assets were expected to clear, or disclosing how they sat relative to upstream oil and gas in the capital queue. Critics argued at the time that the renewables portfolio served a communications purpose as much as a financial one. The current divestment cycle suggests Sawan has reached the same conclusion, or at least a conclusion that low-returning assets have no place in the portfolio regardless of their colour.
Whether the sale process actually launches before the end of this year remains, per Bloomberg’s own hedged framing, conditional. Adviser appointments do not guarantee a transaction; they guarantee a process. If market appetite for offshore wind assets (still under pressure from elevated interest rates and turbine cost inflation) has not sufficiently recovered by the time Shell moves to a formal auction, the $1bn-plus valuation may prove optimistic.
The formal process is expected to launch before year-end, with a sale targeted for 2027. Prospective buyers will want to know precisely which assets remain in the portfolio: given how many have already been exited, the answer to that question is now the central commercial one.




